1. Supererogatory 2. The actual job 3. Yes 4. lol 5. Religious test 6. This is a big part of why scientists are overproduced and the job market is life-destroying. Malthus for the academy. 7. Dangerously vaguehttps://twitter.com/cfchabris/status/969279971209379840 …
If you're going to match Pinker against First Things, I'll side with Pinker every time. First Things is loathsome and that article is garbage.
-
-
eg: The Inuit village example is ludicrously dishonest.
-
I did say specifically Pinker on history specifically, not statistics. I think the article does at least demonstrates that Pinker is clueless when it comes to history, which is rather important for what he is trying to do. The statistical arguments on both ends are fishy
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.