Brutalist architecture is actually evil, though.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata
It's sadistic authoritarianism as designer. Just to pick out one aspect: raw concrete is a viciously cruel material to use in human spaces. It tears at your skin if you rub against it. It slowly crumbles. It's hard to clean.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @puellavulnerata
To modify it you need heavy equipment, and patches/repairs never match the original. My mom worked at a university with a brutalist campus, and the walls *stank* because students would cram chewed gum into holes and crevices.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @puellavulnerata
Can't clean gum out of pourous surfaces like that without heavy equipment. Mom permanently damaged her back falling on a set of steps that were a) built to the wrong scale b) had no support railing because c) 'aesthetic'.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @St_Rev
When I first flew into the Vilnius airport, the first thing I saw were decrepit Khrushchev-era apartment blocks made from hastily-poured concrete. Many Soviet residents had no choice but to live in them.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Yeah. Brutalist architects were strongly attracted toward forced use -- prisons, government buildings, state housing. I don't think you can separate the aesthetic from the sadism.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.