Also Rev, switching the genders doesn't give contrast beyond the obvious gender war slant that's presented in the article. You're still seen as a dude butthurt by girlpower. Replace gender vs gender with race/ethnicity vs race/ethnicity & now the error in framing is layed bare.
-
-
-
Hm, yeah, that does work better.
-
The real culprit is the reporter who gave the results of the study such an smug & gender supremacist headline. Unfortunately the "you've got a persecution complex" rebuttal still works either way.
-
'works'
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But saying female durability is in any way evolutionarily linked to their bearing and rearing of children is verboten.
-
Eh, I think giggling over a pile of dead baby boys is more central here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You know a skillful spin artist would take even Damore’s writing and spin it that way: he was just a bit too autistic for that (although it is there: women are more reliably “not dumb” than men, e.g.). It’s a very positive trait.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, the subtext is affirmative action for women, and the subtext is what matters. Diversity talk is just a vehicle for this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From estrogen having anti-inflammatory properties, needing few calories & in person to person conflicts not being seen as a physical threat (Nurse Wubbles vs. Cop, the recent school board teacher removal AKA high cop encounter survival) are major immutable advantages.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.