I think you need to view this sort of issue in an absolute sense, though. Like, the rates regarding men don't change the fact of the rates regarding women. Too, you should be looking at the rates of crimes committed per gender-upon-gender for a correct comparison, I think?
-
-
That man she's so terrified of is about three times more likely to murder the man standing next to her. She has no claim to victimization.
-
Alright, so. The relevant cells ate (female victim, male offender) = 1735 and (female victim, female offender) = 176. No other cells are relevant to the argument that attackers who target women are predominantly male. Do you have a stake of some sort in this?
-
Please read the preceding tweet, thanks. My point is that she *doesn't* have a stake in this, compared to *literally anyone in any other group*. Murder doesn't concern someone like her, and it's obscene she centers herself as uniquely oppressed.
-
Do you have a stake in this?
-
Unfollow button's right there, go ahead and use it, thanks.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.
