Suggests there's an open power struggle between faculty and administration over who certifies students as worthy--the soul of the college. And if the god-damned *admissions* department makes the call, why spend four years learning?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think that 'if you met the admission standards then you should be able to pass your courses' is particularly strange or disquieting
-
"if you met the admission standards then you should be able to go on a four-year bender and pass your courses" is.
-
That is a) not what it said, but b) equivalent.
-
It's the proposition the professor argued against.
-
He did argue that you can't succeed while being on a bender, but the statement could also be 'if you made it through admissions, we think you know better'. That'd be my story anyways.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The original email seemed quite reasonable to me
-
The responses seem utterly corrupt.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 3 more replies
-
-
-
May as well just award them degrees now, save time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The virgin study all day and night to barely pass vs the chad perpetually partying and acing the course
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since one can not work hard AND can party heavily without incurring a lifetime of non-dischargeable debt...why bother going to college?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.