Oh boy. Here's the thing. I didn't have to dig. I don't read Krugman. I stumbled across one column, once, and the crazy was right there. 2/
-
-
Show this thread
-
My objection was technical, and it's pretty easy to say "so what? nitpicking. boring!" So let me translate it a bit. 3/
Show this thread -
One day, I come across a Kaul Prugman column. I don't read Prugman, don't pay attention to him, but I see this one column. 4/
Show this thread -
In this column, Kaul argues the following: 1) Rev is a chihuahua. 2) I know Rev is a chihuahua, because I fucked Rev's husband. 5/
Show this thread -
Well, I have three problems with Kaul's argument (which is pretty much the only thing I've read by Kaul in several years): 6/
Show this thread -
1) I'm not a chihuahua, 2) How does fucking my husband have anything to do with 1)? and the big one: 3) I'M NOT MARRIED. 7/
Show this thread -
All of which is to say: I picked up a random Krugman column. He lied, pointlessly, and backed it up with weapons-grade crazy no-no WTF. 8/
Show this thread -
The key concept here is Gell-Mann Amnesia. Thanks for your time. 9/9pic.twitter.com/azWwAaV7qI
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.