Well, considering they're counting number of attacks it wouldn't make a material difference.
If you mean the relative population figures, it's a low-quality Fermi estimate, but not gaming.
-
-
Some points I raise should have been presented _alongside_ the ones NYT used. That's one set of issues. Base rate & absolute both matter.
-
Other points go to the validity or lack thereof of the underlying data set--like saying 'since 9/11' when they mean 'since 9/12'.
-
I agree that it's a more complete picture with your numbers. But I think calling that a "debunking" just misunderstands how advocacy works.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.