My contrarian opinion: the new Sokal-style hoax (https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2017/05/19/a-new-academic-hoax-a-bogus-paper-on-the-conceptual-penis-gets-published-in-a-high-quality-peer-reviewed-social-science-journal/ …) is moderately amusing, but it's a pale imitation of the original.
Replying to @StuartJRitchie @razibkhan
The reviewing editor's vita is...interesting. https://www.hud.ac.uk/ourstaff/profile/index.php?staffid=767 …
2:59 AM - 20 May 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.