really? I don't find it incoherent. if you accept that most variance is explained by things beyond the control of policy levers then
-
-
trying to mediate the consequences of that variance seems like an entirely reasonable approach if greater equality is the goal.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @robvfour
If you forget, ignore, or dismiss the fact that those 'consequences' are people's lives, sure.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
all he's really talking about is squeezing the income distribution curve, hardly outlandish policy in 2017.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @robvfour
No, this is some Harrison Bergeron shit.pic.twitter.com/rBiyYYCAO5
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
he denies that he believes such a thing is even possible right below the highlighted section.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @robvfour
But cool if it were! Just takes a little elective brain surgery on those troublesome strivers...
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
lel, we'll be engineering smarter humans not lobotomising the smart ones that exist...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
And people like Freddie will fight it tooth and nail.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.