really? I don't find it incoherent. if you accept that most variance is explained by things beyond the control of policy levers then
-
-
trying to mediate the consequences of that variance seems like an entirely reasonable approach if greater equality is the goal.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @robvfour
If you forget, ignore, or dismiss the fact that those 'consequences' are people's lives, sure.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
all he's really talking about is squeezing the income distribution curve, hardly outlandish policy in 2017.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
if USG reallocated the resources they use trying to fight the 'causes' of inequality & just gave them to the unfortunate it would be better.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @ad_captandum @St_Rev
That's fair, i'd generally prefer just direct cash transfers though. If you still end up on the street that's your business.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm fine with UBI. Freddie is arguing for something closer to this, I think.pic.twitter.com/ygv18LvUH8
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.