Check out this "graph". It makes no sense to compare growth rates like this, because they're changes in _different quantities_. 2/pic.twitter.com/IlKnChH14J
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Check out this "graph". It makes no sense to compare growth rates like this, because they're changes in _different quantities_. 2/pic.twitter.com/IlKnChH14J
Aside from that, it makes a huge howler: graphing circles whose *radii* are the quantity of interest makes for misleading *areas*. 3/
12.6% is 10.5x bigger than 1.2%...but the corresponding circle is 110x bigger! 4/
Friends, it gets worse. Far worse. Consider the following. Same mistake, but this time with a bonus error--2.6 is almost as big as 8??? 5/pic.twitter.com/uswecOtZ3h
Finally, there are no references anywhere in the document. Almost nothing here is something you'd want to know by itself. 6/
And with no links, there's no way to put these random bits of data into a meaningful context. It's all noise. Just noise. 7/
So damn many other things wrong with this. Why are those circles overlapping? It's antiknowledge--you know less after reading it. 8/8
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.