A lot? Compared to genetic engineering, high density integrated circuits, nanotechnology, and titanium drivers?
-
-
Replying to @PalimpsestMan @ClarkHat
Advances in genetics have been fantastic. Consumer-level applications, particularly medical, have been next to nil.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Norman Borlaug would beg to differ. As would most farmers using Monsanto products.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PalimpsestMan @ClarkHat
Borlaug a) did his most important work long before 1987 b) didn't use genetic engineering.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
You started with after 1955. While much of Borlaug's predates it, he was a huge proponent of GMOs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PalimpsestMan @ClarkHat
"2017 is basically 1987 plus Internet and smartphones."
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And GPS, digital cartography, much more efficient internal combustion engines, massive improvements in laparoscopy, carbon fibers, ...
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @PalimpsestMan @ClarkHat
Integrated into the internet, part of the internet, computing tech, incremental improvement, incremental improvement. Respectively.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Put it this way: You're transported to 1987. What's different? What's missing? You sleep in a bed, eat the same food, drive a car.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Deodorant is in a can instead of a stick, your car is crappier, your dishwasher and washing machine are better, but what's *missing*?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The things that are going to drive you completely bananas: no internet, only landlines, three TV networks.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.