129k tweets on "National Security Council" and it looks like not a single god-damned person read the fucking memo.
-
-
Again: NSC is not the Principals Committee. CJCS has not been removed from his position--he can't be, by statute.
-
Regarding Principals committee I'm confused after reading the actual memo vs your tweets. Would you clarify? https://www.lawfareblog.com/national-security-presidential-memorandum-2%E2%80%94president-trumps-nsc-and-hsc …
-
Ah I see, he's invited to attend but not actually NSC member?
-
CJCS is statutory military adviser to NSC. He's expected to attend every NSC meeting. But PC isn't NSC, it's a cabinet org AFAICT
-
I'm not clear on what 'member' means here, precisely, but it doesn't appear CJCS's status has changed at all re: NSC.
-
What I infer, going out on a limb here, is that they're moving to more strongly distinguish military from homeland security.
-
Saying CJCS will attend PC meetings as military advisor _when there's military stuff to advise on_. Not airport policy or w/e
-
Interesting inference & thank you for org info. Could a possibility also be "I can't digest any of this so Steve's giving me tldr?"
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
It's infuriating. Which I guess also means it's working.
-
Airport protests with all those actual placard-carrying openly identifying revolutionary communists who want a hot civil war
-
Huge banner in Seattle from this fine 'socialist' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kshama_Sawant … who wants a one-party Marxist state.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.