being a good and reliable provider for the family, for example
-
-
and/or a principle of taking no more from "society" (however that's envisioned concretely) than you put back
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @schakalsynthetc @jkrwld
I think Deep Thinkers like Smith are fantasizing Meaning the Gov't Could Provide
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
while erasing Meaning the Gov't Destroys (primarily via welfare traps).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I support UBI not because it's necessarily intrinsically good but bc existing system is vastly worse.
3 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
Wouldn't have to "create jobs" (which is impossible anyhow) if you stopped making them impossible already.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It is not impossible to create a job. I can hire someone to paint my fence. I've created a job.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm talking about the media/government shibboleth "create jobs", which always means state intervention.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
But, in the most respectful possible way: do you really not think government can do useful things?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Vaccination, sanitation and public health programs have a good track record. Beyond that, no.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I'm with Huemer: the state can't make most things better bc it can't know how. http://studiahumana.com/pliki/wydania/In%20Praise%20of%20Passivity.pdf …
-
-
I'll read that, thanks.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.