these are some weird prioritieshttps://twitter.com/GroverNorquist/status/797890250479583232 …
-
-
Replying to @sgodofsk @orthonormalist
Yeah. Vaping should be #1 in terms of suffering/mortality.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Wouldn't that be ecofascism as a whole, actually?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Poorly formulated statement. Are you making a joke or do you think there's real QALYs to extract from this?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @orthonormalist @sgodofsk
Tobacco is a known, well-quantified sink of QALYs on a massive scale. Anti-tobacco efforts have their own cost.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Vaping is a solution with essentially no enforcement costs and zero QALY impact.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Cracking down on vaping is self-mutilation of the body politic on a catastrophic scale.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
By comparison, carbon taxes are probably bad but the argument is far less clear-cut.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
(Er, by "zero QALY impact" I mean vaping has essentially no risk. Substituting it zeros out tobacco harms.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.