Hadn't heard about this bit from the Podesta emails. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/441438/wikileaks-john-podesta-silenced-climate-change-dissent … Pielke Jr. was clearly correct. So he had to be crushed.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
Skip the CLIMATE CHANGE chest-beating. Pielke Jr. simply observed that there was no upward trend in weather damage as % of GDP.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
IOW, rising damages are accounted for entirely by rising population and wealth. There is no clear trend in weather severity. Plain truth.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
The use of the proxy of 'economic damage' is itself dishonest - as weather severity is directly measured.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @i_contemplate_ @St_Rev
And Pielke Jr. demolished even this dishonest attempt.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.