Announcement: I have changed my argument for why voting is useless (but not my claim that it is useless.) @DanielPryorr take note. 1/
-
-
It's a false choice. You cannot possibly know which to choose, so it's just a phantom that should be ignored.
-
> it demands a really inhuman/excessive level of epistemic humility. It doesn't. We go through decades of indoctrination...
-
...to develop an inhuman/excessive level of epistemic arrogance by proxy in the service of power. Civil religion. You can stop.
-
this brings up smth about Huemer that I think is a little off. Granting his point about Franklin's doctors, in the political realm..
-
...some policies represent more "invasive surgery" than others. So his own arg suggests indifference is wrong.
-
This is covered by "don't fight for what you believe in".
-
He does in fact give examples of things we seem to know enough about to support, though.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.