Announcement: I have changed my argument for why voting is useless (but not my claim that it is useless.) @DanielPryorr take note. 1/
"If voting patterns are based mostly/entirely on random factors" who said they were?
-
-
I infer from this tweet that voters are embedded in environment of chaotic anti-knowledge. If so, why care what vote split was?pic.twitter.com/ck3MhWcsu7
-
It's confirmation. If a vote goes 40-60, then maybe some real information is contained in that. But then voting is pointless.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.