So: let's suppose you know with certainty that a vote, not counting yourself, will split 50-50. 3/
-
-
Again: if you're relying on the 50-50 vote scenario, you need to take that scenario as data to modify your prior.
-
An honest application of your suggestion might be to vote in accordance with polls weighted by income bracket. So, Trump?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm confused. You often offer political opinions. Is that because you think you are more right than other people?
-
I'm obsessed with the meta problems of how people form and act on political beliefs. It's a hobby.
-
I do not vote, and believe political action to be fundamentally immoral.
-
My personal interest stems from being a severely disabled sperg who desperately wants, like Pinnochio, to be a real live boy
-
If my viewpoints are of interest to others, cool, but I would never enforce them (except as regards cat welfare) on others.
-
Oh, and I do offer a lot of opinions of the form "this is hurting people, stop it". Guilty.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.