The original premise was me arguing against Nate Silver's argument (via @slatestarcodex) for the value of voting.
Silver requires an argument over the whole population to get a numerator big enough to motivate the act of voting.
-
-
But if you argue over the whole population, you're making a claim to knowledge that no one has, absent a book of prophecy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.