If protecting speech is legitimately what is to be taken to be at stake...
-
-
-
Note that "a university" should decide. Universities aren't people; he's really saying *he* and other administrators should.
-
But administrators (largely, increasingly) *aren't part of academic discussion*. They (largely, increasingly) are parasites.
-
So the real power dynamic here is assertion of control over academics and academicians.
-
Without accessing all of the details, a "no trigger warnings" policy would appear on its face to be a prohibition.
-
UChicago doesn't forbid them, they discourage them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What if restricting professors from rendering opinions on subject matter is bad?
-
I'll pretend I didn't hear you say that, comrade.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
one would hope most professors would have no issue refuting harmful fringe ideas themselves, but nope, all commies
End of conversation
-
-
-
And has shit for grammar. The verb is 'legitimize' not 'legitimate'!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are we referring to the "Hitler did nothing wrong" meme? Should the morality of mass genocide not be discussed in academia?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.