If voting isn't supererogatory, aren't we forced into taking actions even more likely to change the outcome?
-
-
Replying to @othercriteria
If the marginal value is $6000, you should be willing to spend $5999 to buy a vote.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @othercriteria
or $5999 of risk to slash a Trump voter's tires or whatever.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @othercriteria
Yes. And the fact that this is mathematically true tells us that Scott has the numerator is way off.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
follow the $5,999 tire-slashing analogy to its end... total value value estimate never changes, but..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
..the marginal cost youre willing to pay to eliminate each subsequent voter increases.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AngloRemnant @othercriteria
Well, one assumes the marginal probability of swinging the election decreases to zero too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
at some point you run out of trump voters
9:17 PM - 28 Sep 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.