1) Accuser explicitly refuses to publicly explain Crockford's offenses. 2) Accuser was involved in the Opal CoC entryist nonsense last year.
-
-
-
3) Structure seems to follow the Lambdaconf playbook, except without actual substance. 4) Conference organizers seem confused and scared.
-
4 cont.) Conference statement explicitly says "We are in over our heads." All of this suggests an activist putsch, not even about Crockford.
-
The activists could dispel the confusion by presenting clear evidence of Crockford's guilt, or even a good story. But they refuse. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
what's important is that they feel uncomfortable not why duh
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I keep hoping beyond hope this insanity is temporary...
-
These are the Crazy Years.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ironically, I *do* know something that would probably be disinvitation-worthy†. But I hardly want to throw fuel on this fire.
-
†by their standards, not mine. Awful essay from years ago, seems to be deleted. It's better off lost to the sands of time, I'd say.
-
I can believe that, yeah.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.