Alternate take: "eco-friendliness" not scientifically founded, mostly expresses female-coded cultural prejudices. https://archive.fo/NLSN2
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
eg: organic farming, which is useless nutritionally and expends more resources per calorie produced. You're buying holiness at a markup.
4 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
The 1-to-1 mapping of organic benefits to "nutritional" is strange. But provides good logical fallacy for dismissing organic
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @tab2space
How about: Food is no better, environmental impacts are significantly worse.
12:00 AM - 1 Sep 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.