Alternate take: "eco-friendliness" not scientifically founded, mostly expresses female-coded cultural prejudices. https://archive.fo/NLSN2
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
eg: organic farming, which is useless nutritionally and expends more resources per calorie produced. You're buying holiness at a markup.
4 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
the 'useless nutritionally' thing is wrong, though multis are cheaper in $ and footprint.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TrivialGravitas
It adds nothing compared to comparable foods grown using standard techniques.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
This is a point blank falsehood, higher micronutrient content is consistently found.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @St_Rev1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @TrivialGravitas
Your study showed a mean difference of...less than 6%. Not consistently--462 vs. 364. Basically noise.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
Different plants get different results. Also you are seriously statistically illiterate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
oooooooooookay, have a great day.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.