Alternate take: "eco-friendliness" not scientifically founded, mostly expresses female-coded cultural prejudices. https://archive.fo/NLSN2
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
eg: organic farming, which is useless nutritionally and expends more resources per calorie produced. You're buying holiness at a markup.
4 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
-
Replying to @lanceka
The article doesn't discuss biodiversity (or, to be fair, organic food).
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
Actually all it discusses is a marketing professor's microscopic study (n = 127!) and a bunch of horseshit speculation.
0 replies
1 retweet
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.