Alternate take: "eco-friendliness" not scientifically founded, mostly expresses female-coded cultural prejudices. https://archive.fo/NLSN2
-
-
Actually all it discusses is a marketing professor's microscopic study (n = 127!) and a bunch of horseshit speculation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
totally...responding to your example - I posit that biodynamic farming IS scientifically, demonstrably more sustainable than BigAg.
-
that's not what the article is about at all, I know...and of course now BigAg is into organic (which is not biodynamic)...
-
Spirit of organic movement as embodied in biodynamic practices is good, but the label has clearly been co-opted as a marketing tool
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.