Alternate take: "eco-friendliness" not scientifically founded, mostly expresses female-coded cultural prejudices. https://archive.fo/NLSN2
-
-
preserving biodiversity doesn't count for anything?
-
The article doesn't discuss biodiversity (or, to be fair, organic food).
-
Actually all it discusses is a marketing professor's microscopic study (n = 127!) and a bunch of horseshit speculation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The 1-to-1 mapping of organic benefits to "nutritional" is strange. But provides good logical fallacy for dismissing organic
-
How about: Food is no better, environmental impacts are significantly worse.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.