At NYT, "Room for Debate" means four people saying "this law is a good start but we need to do more". https://archive.is/3RhFl
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
And as usual, boy do this lady hate and have idiotically low opinion of women. Apparently they can't possibly ask for a raise.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @robertnlee
The idiocy doesn't surprise me. Having four people violently agree and calling it a debate does, slightly.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev @robertnlee
I keep thinking they can't sink below my estimation and they keep doing it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @St_Rev @robertnlee
Then again, the "debate" on "why are Trump fans so terrible" is split on whether it's racism or sexism.
9:00 AM - 15 Aug 2016
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.