@St_Rev Not sure how these things contradict each other.
There was no meaningful political content in what they did to Hogan, or Justine Sacco, or...
-
-
Shouldn't it be the principle of free political speech then?
-
There are counterveiling rights of privacy and against injury. Hogan's lawsuit was fully justified.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why do you believe that only speech with political content is protected?
-
I don't. Keep moving.
-
Then why bother distinguishing "public interest" or "political" speech?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.