So, what has gone wrong in all these claims? Other than #1, factual falsity is not the problem, and there are no errors of logic.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
Each argument is totally valid in other cases—just not about Washington being the first President. But they are wrong ways of thinking here.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Seems like mostly misreading context of reference. eg the President-ness of Obama lies *outside Obama*.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness 7 elides two different concepts of 'exists': exists within spacetime vs. exists at time T.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness can go down the list but I'm guessing that is not really desired?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness Maybe a good general metaphor here is lossy compression vs. edge cases.
2:46 PM - 24 Apr 2016
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness ah but that's basically what you aready said nvm0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.