The analogy of using force in self-defense and using SJW tactics to defend against SJWs is imperfect. 1/
@St_Rev @maradydd @paxdickinson
-
-
Replying to @random_eddie
Force is justified only when it's necessary to stop an attack. It may destroy the attacker, but that's a consequence, not the goal. 2/
1 reply 5 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @random_eddie
SJW tactics inherently have destruction of their target as their goal. They can't be used simply to make someone stop. They always kill. 3/
3 replies 5 retweets 15 likes
Replying to @random_eddie
@random_eddie @ClarkHat Note that the 451 fundraiser was a precisely targeted *constructive* counter to a destructive strategy.
10:24 AM - 13 Apr 2016
1 reply
0 retweets
2 likes
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.