-
-
-
@j_mcnally This is a reasonable point!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev “It turns out that you can beat a human at Go by playing billions of games and recording which board configurations lead to wins” -
@St_Rev Which, based on the very little I know about Go, comes as no surprise at all -
@St_Rev I’m really frustrated by this thing because it’s so stupid, but getting an audience up to speed on the technical issues would take > -
@St_Rev > a lot of effort that I don’t have time for & isn’t as important as other things. But the scale of misrepresentation really grates -
@St_Rev Have to remind myself that on the scale of memetic evil, this is down around 1.8 out of 10. -
@St_Rev It’s having spent a full-time year (around 1990) figuring out why this stuff is nonsense that gets me going, but that’s a sunk cost! -
@St_Rev If I had taken a few months to write up the analysis then, it wouldn’t be bugging me now. -
@St_Rev Sorry to vent! - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev Humans built a network of datacenters that can beat a human champion at Go. We aren't that good yet. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@St_Rev Probably due to char. limit, your correction missed an important point. He was still a top human at Go. Beating *a* human is easy.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.