"This member of X is a bad person" is useful data if X has a dozen members. If X has 10 mil members, it's useless. Worse than useless. 1/5
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
In a group of ten million, you can always find a psychopath. But our intuitions are calibrated for 10-100 people. 2/5
1 reply 4 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
So it's easy to "prove" to a human that any particular group of ten million people is evil--particularly in the age of the Internet. 3/5
1 reply 4 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
We discount bad examples in small, high-status groups--exactly where that kind of information is actually relevant and important. 4/5
2 replies 3 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @TristanSevers
@TristanSevers There's lots of sort of uniform smearing of Team Enemy. But very few people are willing to talk specifics.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@TristanSevers Like, you can draw cartoons, but if ppl were serious Ted Kennedy would never have been allowed to be dogcatcher, ever.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@TristanSevers You can call Kennedy a ratfucking tumor but anyone who talks about his negligent homicide is a crank.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TristanSevers
@St_Rev Actually caring that the human named Ted Kennedy killed someone makes you the guy who thinks wrestling plotlines are real.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.