Every last part of that answer is not just wrong. It's trivially, even childishly wrong.
-
-
-
> this is a violent question No it isn't. > it implies need for proof is more important than addressing No it doesn't!
-
That bit is a vicious double bind--you can't possibly address a problem without knowing what it is!
-
@St_Rev Kafkatrapping, as ESR called it. -
@i_contemplate_ This is more like the cliche about the angry irrational wife. It's a double bind but I don't think one of ESR's types. -
@i_contemplate_ "If you really loved me you'd just know!" -
@St_Rev Ah yes. So just a shit-test then. Response should be similar - ignore.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev "asking for evidence is itself out of bounds" is a familiar refrain here on Twitter; why a surprise the same people use it offline? -
@mattskala It's well to note it explicitly, so we may more readily recognize it under more stressful circumstances.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev don't lose your glorious innocence about how people are... oops. Too Late. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@BrowningMachine@ArthurFrDent It's a swarm organism, though. Like bees. -
@St_Rev@BrowningMachine@ArthurFrDent How to defeat swarm organisms? What's our pesticide? -
@i_contemplate_@St_Rev@BrowningMachine logic... seems to make their heads explode... so there is that...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev cf. "sealionning"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.