OK, after some discussion with @A_P_Mason: Study doesn't show what the NYT op-ed claims. The string '254' only shows up as a footnote tag!
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
The major quantitative results are in table 4, but they're poorly presented. It's not even clear what time period is covered.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
Eg: Most cases are 'unaffiliated', ie lone nuts labeled right-wing terrorists because...they carved a swastika into their face?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @kevin_bowen
@kevin_bowen Yeah. I'm not getting paid enough to do a deep dive on the report but it's not clear WTF the numbers actually mean
10:35 AM - 1 Dec 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.