@Meaningness No subsidies in Georgia. Anyway, they could have explained what cat coverage is, why it's cheap, and what the actual benefit is
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness but no, 15 paragraphs of numbers and whining1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness By avoiding any hint of understanding, articles like this make the problem worse.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Meaningness Like, an article full of people complaining their cell phone plans don't provide a car implies by omission that they SHOULD.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev > but I guess NYT agenda is to encourage it to change to be what it was claimed to be, without undermining its original advocates.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev Also I have to say: the only plan to available to me is effectively cat-only and costs $500/month, so I’d be super happy with $75.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev Either people in GA are much healthier than people in NV or there’s a large subsidy in that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness I assume the people interviewed were in New York, because only New York is real.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@Meaningness Combination of federal mandate and GA refusing subsidies = it is literally illegal to be poor in GA.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.