NYT manages an entire article full of numbers without actually presenting any information. https://archive.is/W4kqR
-
-
@St_Rev (Oh, I thought subsidies were national.) Yes, I see your point; failing to explain the benefit of cat coverage was a major fail. -
@Meaningness By avoiding any hint of understanding, articles like this make the problem worse. -
@Meaningness Like, an article full of people complaining their cell phone plans don't provide a car implies by omission that they SHOULD. -
@St_Rev Well, although, the plan was sold as “affordable health care for everyone.” So pointing out that it doesn’t provide that is legit, > -
@St_Rev > but I guess NYT agenda is to encourage it to change to be what it was claimed to be, without undermining its original advocates. -
@St_Rev Also I have to say: the only plan to available to me is effectively cat-only and costs $500/month, so I’d be super happy with $75. -
@St_Rev Either people in GA are much healthier than people in NV or there’s a large subsidy in that. -
@Meaningness I assume the people interviewed were in New York, because only New York is real. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.