Because that's what NYT does. They agitate for somebody (ie USG) to do SOMETHING, so they can rage at them for doing it.
-
-
-
I don't say this to defend USG or its tentacles; USG's particulars are often catastrophically bad. But NYT makes the world worse.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev it's always easier to criticise than to solve. but to pretend moral high ground is pretentious when you offer no better alternative -
@radix023 The calculation is probably simpler for NYT: if it bleeds it leads. But people shouldn't be RTing this uncritically. -
@St_Rev agreed, but let's face it, the vast majority of social media interaction isn't communication or reasoning, but tribal identification - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@St_Rev one reason the press is relatively quiet on Syria, I bet. it's so obvious there are no good options there even the NYT has noticedThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.