Is it true that IQ 120-130 people are more successful t… — If this is about that blog post that's been going aroun…http://l.ask.fm/igoto/45DKECN75V62DDAUPY6IQO6Q5O3A7KAMZXZ6VG5HDP4OVI7IS53ZCZ2HFJBMYRRWLDYLQS3OAAZH6EYD2547O35EPXZ2NA3SUQARRPSQA5TD6M75K6HDKLXLSCV3XTTCTSLY6EQ3ZHMHXE4LCCLAKX3U6XPUP7UKZ7SBPPSYVOYL4Y72D5UHRRX56ZV73NQ= …
-
-
Replying to @blue_traveler
@blue_traveler They truncated the right-hand tail of the IQ distribution (ppl smart enough to be doctors/lawyers/etc., say 120+...)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@blue_traveler ...then recalculated mean and SD of the new data set and proceeded as if it were a new Gaussian. Which is Fucking. Wrong.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@blue_traveler They should have first rescaled IQ to have an exponential (or uniform) distribution.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @othercriteria
@othercriteria@blue_traveler Or, for the purposes of what they were trying to find, *used the truncated Gaussian* and normalized.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@othercriteria @blue_traveler They weren't doing anything complicated, just "we expect X% IQ 140+ and Y% 160+ and we see X' Y'" but wrong
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.