@GabrielDuquette The best I have heard is "You can't use Bayes if you can't cover the entire probability space", but that's a strawman.
-
-
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@ContentOfMedia@GabrielDuquette Disagree. Defining the space of outcomes is a precondition for Bayes; Bayes tells you nothing here.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@ContentOfMedia@GabrielDuquette Plus it's not just an issue of covering, but spreading a finite measure over lots of space.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @othercriteria
@othercriteria@ContentOfMedia@GabrielDuquette Yeah, lots of weird moral paradoxes seem like they arise from bad measure theory.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@ContentOfMedia@GabrielDuquette I don't know if you're being serious or not, and I'd like to keep it that way!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @othercriteria
@othercriteria Dead serious. eg antinatalism tries to reason about harms done/not done to nonexistent entities. erm1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.