@St_Rev It's really poorly designed, but looks like it's 5% in 1950 to 25% in 2008. Really should have units properly marked.
-
-
-
@gattsuru Right. 25% is 1 in 4 but 5% is not 1 in 50. -
@St_Rev And (boring through the paywall) it looks like they used 1-in-20 for 1950 within the article. Weird typo, though not the strangest.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.