Foundational formalism, more intuitive than ZFC or category theory, by my sometime-officemate David McAllesterhttps://machinethoughts.wordpress.com/2015/01/27/the-foundations-of-mathematics-2/ …
-
-
@St_Rev “rigidity property”? -
@Meaningness requiring that f induce a natural mapping to N brutally clamps down on your universe of functions. -
@St_Rev in case not clear, multisets are just an example application—this is not a general requirement! -
@Meaningness anyway yeah I know what multisets are, just found the presentation confusing
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness eg f: R -> [0,1) given by f(x) = x mod 1 -
@St_Rev As a computer scientist, he’s primarily interested in finite domains… -
@Meaningness @&#@ @&#@ (@# -
@St_Rev Yeah, I’m not sure that his “foundations” would be useful to analysts :-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.