@puellavulnerata I guess I just have the sense that continuity should be more or less atomic, not something to sneak up on w/infinities.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata
@puellavulnerata Finitists have lots of deep and valid criticisms of pretty much every step of that process. Lousy alternatives, ofc.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@puellavulnerata But yeah, we only ever have access to finite amounts of information about bounded chunks of spacetime. That's the context>3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata
@puellavulnerata Well, yeah, because that's baked into the toolkit. The initial step of representing smears of information...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@puellavulnerata ...using infinite-precision atoms and then building back up, because the light's better under that particular lamppost.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@puellavulnerata I certainly don't have any better ideas, though. I'm just an FG-module hacker.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.