@puellavulnerata @RachelHaywire Well, the approach certainly works, but it's Rube Goldbergy. Lots of technical weirdness we learn to ignore.
@puellavulnerata But yeah, we only ever have access to finite amounts of information about bounded chunks of spacetime. That's the context>
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@puellavulnerata Well, yeah, because that's baked into the toolkit. The initial step of representing smears of information... -
@puellavulnerata ...using infinite-precision atoms and then building back up, because the light's better under that particular lamppost. -
@puellavulnerata I certainly don't have any better ideas, though. I'm just an FG-module hacker.
End of conversation
-
-
-
@puellavulnerata >in which we see connectedness/continuity, whatever that is. Invoking inaccessible constructions...¯\_(ツ)_/¯Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.