Time to take a step way the fuck back and try to really understand why and how Wikipedia (& spinoffs like lolRationalWiki) has failed.
-
-
Replying to @Melhyphen
@Melhyphen a) toxic culture supporting b) obsessive axe-grinding on ideologically-charged subjects and c) decay of neutral articles2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Melhyphen
@Melhyphen 'Anyone can edit' is less and less true. Culture has developed and nurtured a class of obsessive rule-lawyers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Melhyphen a) small cabals lock down ideologically charged articles. gamergate is a good example.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Melhyphen b) neutral articles get mangled by aspie obsessive types who are just editing for the sake of editing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@Melhyphen LOTS of math articles are just garbage these days. Word salad.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Melhyphen I opened this thread with an example. Text arguing with itself in broken prose.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@Melhyphen guess it's not directly linked in this chain. here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_type_theory#Extensional_versus_intensional …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.