The point of anti-choice feminism seems pretty clear: if choices are of no value, taking them away is no harm. Obvious implications.
-
-
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing It’s easy to see that *some* (maybe even most) women would benefit by restricting some other women’s choices… -
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing It’s technically interesting to see whether they have an argument that *all* women could be so benefitted. -
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing arguing in terms of collectives reifies--and disappears--the well-being of actually-existing women -
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing but there's a bait-and-switch: just imagine how nice it would be if you were on top of the pecking order! ... -
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing well, when we defeat patriarchy, ALL women will be on top of the pecking order! like a string with one end. -
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing Everyone’s income will be above average, and no one will be in the evil 1%
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.