Do all "humanists" believe in a sort of magical priceless ether? http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2015/04/15/the-capitalists-zombie/ …
-
-
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
For my part, I think the thing described is quite susceptible to analysis - it's just that the sensory mode of perceiving it is richer.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @sarahdoingthing
@sarahdoingthing Essay creeps up on something very important and gets it completely wrong, AFAICT2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing I agree. Pondering now how much work to put into a rebuttal (if any).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing Basically I think this is standard scientistic-nihilist argument against Romanticism/monism/Idealism/essentialism >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
@St_Rev@sarahdoingthing > which is mostly right, but wrong in its individualism-reductionism, and in not seeing what’s right in Romanticism1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness
@Meaningness@sarahdoingthing Whole thing struck me as kind of...Gladwellian? Here's a new concept X I invented, everything is X!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Meaningness @sarahdoingthing The take on authenticity-as-such didn't seem quite right, but identifying it so strongly w/so many bugged me
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.