@Gormogons @LibertyFarmNH @ClarkHat Suppose it has 70% penetration in star-bellied sneetches, but only 30% in w/o stars upon thars. Welp.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@Gormogons@LibertyFarmNH@ClarkHat That's something that's hard to argue away, but (w/CRISPR), fixable. Turning away is *immoral*.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev GP Manipulation of the genome may also be immoral. Playing God with nature? How far is too far? Etc.@LibertyFarmNH@ClarkHat1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gormogons
@Gormogons@LibertyFarmNH@ClarkHat "Are you SURE you want to live forever?" "Dunno. Ask me again in 500 years."1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev GP Assuming your premise that genetic manipulation is a necessary good. Smacks of eugenics to me.@LibertyFarmNH@ClarkHat1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Replying to @LibertyFarmNH
@LibertyFarmNH GP I'm all for choice, but it's going to be expensive, which means government will pay/regulate.@ClarkHat@St_Rev1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gormogons
@Gormogons@ClarkHat@St_Rev At first. Given that we can already sequence DNA, analyze DNA, and PRINT DNA - it'll be dirt cheap eventually.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LibertyFarmNH
@LibertyFarmNH GP And everyone will be exactly the same. Again, I'm forecasting, but it seems the natural consequence.@ClarkHat@St_Rev1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Gormogons @LibertyFarmNH @ClarkHat Yeah, von Neumann and James Joyce, two peas in a pod there.
-
-
Replying to @St_Rev
@St_Rev GP You're assuming the expression of the genome will continue to vary. May or may not.@LibertyFarmNH@ClarkHat0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.