@ClarkHat What you're talking about is why I sometimes use the label right-intersectionalist. The sensible endgame of intersectionality...
-
-
@ClarkHat And as an individualist-anarchist, I don't have to GIVE a shit. Population norms might affect policy, but I'm not a king. -
@ClarkHat When it comes to crime, I care about--duh!--criminals, as in people who actually do bad things. Life isn't a fucking sim game. -
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@ClarkHat I tend to agree with Razib Khan that we'll start to have real data in ~10 years, and it's useless to speculate yet. -
@ClarkHat Also think it's reasonable to be suspicious of motives of ppl who act like the data exists now. CDC/FBI data, yes. Genes, no. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@ClarkHat I can throw out a half-dozen other plausible hypotheses for the same data without breaking a sweat. -
@ClarkHat HBD is manifestly true in motte--black people have darker skin, lactase persistence is unequally distributed & coevolves w/culture -
@ClarkHat The motte is infested with assholes, scumbags and Zermatists. So, yeah, <waves black flag> don't give a shit! -
@ClarkHat erm, bailey. wait do I have them backwards? shit
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@NRxNorth
@ClarkHat Genetics is a plausible hypothesis. Give it ten years and there might be support for it. Not today. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
@NRxNorth
@ClarkHat Big genomics will shred the taboo, whether people like it or not. There WILL be strong genes-to-behavior/IQ data. -
@NRxNorth
@ClarkHat Whether that points to major pop. differences in the mean...suspect that'll be more complex than right or left likes.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.